Search results

Like when Pedro fired the ball into Groß against Chelsea. Instead of taking a touch and shooting he took a touch, took another.. and another and then had to turn back and recycle possession.

Your stats show the best goals per appearance, not the best finisher. Best finisher would relate to goals Vs xG rather than goals per game. Also your stats don't take into account minutes played per game. Undav has 124 minutes per goal whilst Murray sits at 205 minutes per goal, putting...

Not sure how you can call the best finisher in the time we've been in the PL "misfiring".

Oh yeah the club never gets anything wrong, that Gykeres is a donkey and couldn't score a single goal.

Apart from those? Scored another few tidy finishes that nobody else in the squad would.

It's clichéd but true, Maupay was a scorer of great goals but not a great goal scorer.

Not as much as it could be though. Apparently they have an option to buy related to how well he and them perform. With CL football we're looking at maybe £20m based on earlier reports.

To be fair he wasn't a bit part player towards the end of the season. He was starting most games and performing too.

It's been heavily commented that the option to buy in the contract was related to how well Undav and Stuttgart did in this season. As such we'll be getting pretty heavily compensated for his departure if Stuttgart trigger the option.

"In 20 matches since their winter break, Bayer Leverkusen have scored 11 goals in 90+ minutes and another 6 goals in 81+ minutes. 12 of those goals proved decisive in result. 4 games in a row scoring in minute 89+." This is now 12 goals in 90+, 13 (including 81+) that have proved decisive, and...

Leverkusen are unbelievable

Just scored a great goal to put Stuttgart 2-0 up against Leverkusen and put their invincible season on the ropes.

That's not how option to buy clauses work. The clause is a set amount that if they pay we have no choice but to accept it.

Kane is also playing in a far better team than he ever did in the PL.

It's not a 4-3-2-1, it's either a 4-2-3-1 or a 4-2-4 depending on how you want to look at it. The two central forward players alternate dropping deep and play like double false 9s almost. We also build up in a 2-4-2-2 with the wingers the furthest players forward, hence how Adingra scored...

Because we don't play with a striker at all in a traditional sense but also don't play with a traditional central attacking midfielder. We play with two 9.5s who alternate, not a traditional striker at all

Neither of our strikers play as a full striker. Maybe actually read what I've posted before replying to it? This part for example. A 4-3-3 is nothing like what we play. A 4-3-3 indicates a more defence minded CM in between two box to box/more attacking midfielders. Two wingers or inside...

We don't play this way at all. If you want to get all technical talking about YouTube videos I can get a lot more technical. When we have the ball in our defensive third we operate in a 2-4-2-2 with our CBs dropping deep, our fullbacks and midfielders sitting slightly in front of them and then...

Welbeck who missed 5 squads last season through injury?

No we don't, we play with two strikers where they alternate between dropping deep and being the focal point, or both drop. It's like having two half striker half attacking mids.