Search results

Almost sounds like a form of corruption....

Let's call it what it is..corruption. All to protect Israel and it's ethnic cleansing. A flavour of what's to come in for a Starmer government? https://uk.news.yahoo.com/labour-threatened-bring-speaker-down-153612005.html

You dont need to listen to me. Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, and Btselem (Israeli Human Rights group) say its Apartheid and Israel is has been taken to the ICJ by South Africa. There are very few sane people that argue that Israel is not in the least committing mass war crimes...

There it is. Opposing Apartheid and genocide is "anti-semitism". Strange times

You might not buy it but decades of UK following the US in every political position will prove that it's the case. We are the proverbial tail of the dog. Even if we accept your rationale...that infers Starmer is happy to support Apartheid and genocide simply to get into power. Sort of shows the...

Don't think the Mail is a key reason. He has been supportive of Israel and it's war crimes since the start. He is supportive of whatever Israel does as it's politically advantageous (aligns with US policy) and the Labour front bench and also a number of leading members including Starmer are in...

Starmer wholeheartedly supporting the genocide taking place right now might be (should be) considered a big problem by some voters but not enough to stop him getting elected.

True, not recognised by the UK but is by 138 of the 193 UN members You would have thought that even dual citizens would be banned from joining the IDF on the grounds of Israeli war crimes and ethnic cleansing but that would be too much to hope from both our morally bankrupt parties.

Can UK citizens also go and fight for Palestinians. If not why not? Question to anyone, not you specifically

Cants see the issue with what Graham Jones said. Allowing UK citizens to go and fight for a genocidal army that upholds Apartheid state shouldn't be lawful.

Coogan was spot on on about Starmer. The guy stands for everything and nothing. He lies easily and frequently. His answers on topics fully depend on the way the political wind is blowing. He will weaponise anything including race and religion for political purposes and will ruthless through...

Not odd at all. Client journalism does not mean what you describe. Journos like Pippa Cleary tweets about Starmers Labour through a positive filter process and they word their tweets accordingly. Rachel Wearmouth does the same. Tories do the same through their network of journalists. Its...

If a history book or dictionary ever needed a clear and concise example of client journalism in the UK - its that tweet

Bland centrism (i.e status quo) may well win the election but doesnt equate to significant/radical changes which are desperately needed - Energy, NHS, Housing etc. Very confident that anything moderately significant Starmer proposes will be watered down significantly or binned once hes in power.

There are very few politicians who I would trust to try and carry out what they said they would and certainly, not the heads of the current two main parties. This current version of Labour will be indecipherable from the Tories once in power

If you believe anything Starmer promises then I fear you will be very disappointed. He's the ''chosen'' one for areason. Wont rock the boat etc