Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

Register Log in

[Politics] The 2024 US Election - Trump v Harris

Who will win the 2024 Presidential Election?

  • President Joe Biden - Democrat

    Votes: 3 0.8%

  • Donald Trump - Republican

    Votes: 139 38.6%

  • Vice President, Kamala Harris - Democrat

    Votes: 200 55.6%

  • Other Democratic candidate tbc

    Votes: 18 5.0%
  • Total voters
    360
  • This poll will close: .


US Seagull

US Seagull

Well-known member
Jul 17, 2003
4,480
Cleveland, OH
Crawley Dingo said:
RFK was Lawfare and sabotage. Gabbard had her debate interview removed from CNN for starters
www.vox.com

Tulsi Gabbard vs. the DNC: her complaint about debate exclusion, explained

Gabbard argues, unconvincingly, that the DNC’s process for winnowing the debate field lacked “transparency.”
www.vox.com www.vox.com



and the rest you can google..
Click to expand...

So... you got nothing then? As I suspected.

RFK lying about where he lived so that he got kicked off some ballots by the board of elections is not the doing of the Democrats. And it benefited Trump more than Harris and Biden. But it's clear the GOP are the party of no laws now.

Gabbard whining about not making the cut for the third debate isn't a "stitch up" either. She had no support because she wasn't very good. People not voting for you is called "democracy" not a "stitch up".
 




Triggaaar

Triggaaar

Well-known member
Oct 24, 2005
52,725
Goldstone
Crawley Dingo said:
This has been explained. If I'm getting 3 responses or more for every post, I am not going to reply to al of them with citations
Click to expand...

Very poor excuse. You don't reply in good faith to any.


Crawley Dingo said:
nd links to a bunch of bad faith actors who have NEVER conceded one point(Zeberdi the exception i think)
Click to expand...

You make very few points to concede to, but there are hundreds for you to accept, and you ignore them all.

Calling everyone else a bad faith actor is disingenuous. You can't seriously think we're all lying. You need to consider the possibility that you may be in the wrong.
 
Last edited:


Pavilionaire

Pavilionaire

Well-known member
Jul 7, 2003
31,184
The Clamp said:
He’s been “Truthing” that Harris got where she is by giving blowjobs. If I’ve understood the story correctly.
Click to expand...
Attacks like that just leave a nasty taste.
 


B

Bodian

Well-known member
May 3, 2012
13,969
Cumbria
Crawley Dingo said:
This has been explained. If I'm getting 3 responses or more for every post, I am not going to reply to al of them with citations and links to a bunch of bad faith actors who have NEVER conceded one point(Zeberdi the exception i think). My time is valuable to me and I have the same level of contempt for most posters on these threads as they do for me. If in doubt google it yourself.
Click to expand...
I must admit I'm puzzled as to why you are here at all.

You say your time is valuable, and you have contempt for most posters here, and you don't really engage by posting actual information or links to back up anything you imply/say. You rarely post on non-political (ie: football) threads.

So what is it you are actually here for - why are you wasting your time posting unverified stuff to people you have contempt for? What are you trying to achieve?
 
Last edited:






Zeberdi

Zeberdi

“Vorsprung durch Technik”
NSC Patron
Oct 20, 2022
6,608
Any chance we can please stop the thread from being continually derailed with the same people having futile exchanges with CD and focus on the issues/Candidates instead?

Too much point scoring going on.

Perhaps put CD on ignore if people have a problem with him personally and CD likewise with those that are pissing you off because I for one want to see updates and discussions actually about the election and the candidates not this continual trolling of individual posters - I am sure I am not alone in that..

CD if you post what are generally contentious POV s without backing them up with verifiable references ( video/news reports etc) you can‘t blame people for calling you out. Suggest you look at some of the Republican policy positions/what Senators are saying rather than looking to Trump -( his rhetoric is a little deranged and off script most of the time but the GOP will give you an idea of what a Republican President will bring to the WH in the next 4 years if they win)

You don’t have to justify why you are on NSC though - not IMO - but yep, let’s hear why the Republicans in your POV would deserve your vote over the Democrats.
 


Mellotron

Mellotron

I've asked for soup
Jul 2, 2008
32,380
Brighton
Zeberdi said:
CD if you post what are generally contentious POV s without backing them up with verifiable references ( video/news reports etc) you can‘t blame people for calling you out. Suggest you look at some of the Republican policy positions/what Senators are saying rather than looking to Trump -( his rhetoric is a little deranged and off script most of the time but the GOP will give you an idea of what a Republican President will bring to the WH in the next 4 years if they win)

You don’t have to justify why you are on NSC though - not IMO - but yep, let’s hear why the Republicans in your POV would deserve your vote over the Democrats.
Click to expand...
This - not being called out for supporting the Republicans - being called out for frequently posting bizarre/easily disproven comments and then refusing to back them up with any context or content whatsoever.
 


StonehamPark

StonehamPark

#Brighton-Nil
Oct 30, 2010
10,133
BC, Canada
Crawley Dingo said:
This has been explained. If I'm getting 3 responses or more for every post, I am not going to reply to al of them with citations and links to a bunch of bad faith actors who have NEVER conceded one point(Zeberdi the exception i think). My time is valuable to me and I have the same level of contempt for most posters on these threads as they do for me. If in doubt google it yourself.
Click to expand...
How come you’ve replied to my prior two posts which lightly called your character into question.

— but totally ignored my prior two posts to you, providing irrefutable evidence disproving your twitter theories/stories?

You ‘don’t have time’ for one, but do for the other?
 




Crawley Dingo

Crawley Dingo

Political thread tourist.
Mar 31, 2022
1,002
US Seagull said:
So... you got nothing then? As I suspected.

RFK lying about where he lived so that he got kicked off some ballots by the board of elections is not the doing of the Democrats. And it benefited Trump more than Harris and Biden. But it's clear the GOP are the party of no laws now.

Gabbard whining about not making the cut for the third debate isn't a "stitch up" either. She had no support because she wasn't very good. People not voting for you is called "democracy" not a "stitch up".
Click to expand...
And how many voted for Kamala?" Protecting our Democracy" :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO:
 


Crawley Dingo

Crawley Dingo

Political thread tourist.
Mar 31, 2022
1,002
Triggaaar said:
Very poor excuse. You don't reply in good faith to any.




You make very few points to concede to, but there are hundreds for you to accept, and you ignore them all.

Calling everyone else a bad faith actor is disingenuous. You can't seriously think we're all lying. You need to consider the possibility that you may be in the wrong.
Click to expand...
Most common responses are ridicule with posters "high fiving" each other as they go, blocked posters tailing me smearing and sniping(Wish people wouldn't quote them but..). I do have a little good faith but its not for the usual suspects on here as they have lost it.
 


Crawley Dingo

Crawley Dingo

Political thread tourist.
Mar 31, 2022
1,002
Bodian said:
I must admit I'm puzzled as to why you are here at all.

You say your time is valuable, and you have contempt for most posters here, and you don't really engage by posting actual information or links to back up anything you imply/say. You rarely post on non-political (ie: football) threads.

So what is it you are actually here for - why are you wasting your time posting unverified stuff to people you have contempt for? What are you trying to achieve?
Click to expand...
Are you or any of the others here questioned on purpose? Maybe you should have a word with Bad fish who I have never seen make a football post.

Your hypocrisy aside, yea ive goofed a couple of times whereas you are all perfect? But see if you can prove you are not just leftwing scum and not dine out on a couple of errors from now on eh?
 




Triggaaar

Triggaaar

Well-known member
Oct 24, 2005
52,725
Goldstone
Crawley Dingo said:
Most common responses are ridicule with posters "high fiving" each other as they go
Click to expand...

Why do you think so many people are ridiculing you? Is the board just full of nasty people who are happy to ridicule anyone with a different opinion? No, no it's not. The truth is that quite a few people don't even think your account is genuine, and can't believe the things you post. That's not on them, it's on you.

If you're a staunch Republican who would never vote Democrat, that's fine. If one particular policy (eg, immigration) is so important to you that it overrides everything else, that's fine too. But instead you seem to be arguing that what Trump says and does is ok. It's not ok. No decent person could think it is, and so if you try and argue that he's done nothing wrong, and that he's not just constantly lying, then you're going have a lot of people mocking you.
 


Crawley Dingo

Crawley Dingo

Political thread tourist.
Mar 31, 2022
1,002
StonehamPark said:
How come you’ve replied to my prior two posts which lightly called your character into question.

— but totally ignored my prior two posts to you, providing irrefutable evidence disproving your twitter theories/stories?

You ‘don’t have time’ for one, but do for the other?
Click to expand...

Most people prioritize Character assassinations. If I skipped a couple its either because of lack of time, the posts are asinine or they've flipped me the finger first(laughter smilie) so They get it back and ignored. Unlike most on here I do not look for weak posts as a vector of attack.
 






5

5Ways Gull

È quello che è
Feb 2, 2009
1,130
Fiveways, Brighton
Triggaaar said:
There should have been enough over the last 8 years for voters to turn away from him. It's so difficult to get your head around why any decent person would vote for him.
Click to expand...
This also troubles me greatly. I can only think that these people are "Republicans" who would rather vote for that tosser than any Democrat, however comparably decent.
 




US Seagull

US Seagull

Well-known member
Jul 17, 2003
4,480
Cleveland, OH
I don't know about you guys, but I tend to think that flashing a (y) over a grave is just a bit weird

trump_thumbs_afghan.jpg

Even if it was legally allowed to do that at the national cemetery. Even if it wasn't the grave of a dead service person.

Maybe, maybe, if it was the grave of your (ex-) mortal enemy? Even then it seems a bit distasteful.
 
Last edited:


seagullsovergrimsby

seagullsovergrimsby

#cpfctinpotclub
Aug 21, 2005
43,915
Crap Town
US Seagull said:
I don't know about you guys, but I tend to think that flashing a (y) over a grave is just a bit weird

trump_thumbs_afghan.jpg

Even if it was legally allowed to do that at the national crematory. Even if it wasn't the grave of a dead service person.

Maybe, maybe, if it was the grave of your (ex-) mortal enemy? Even then it seems a bit distasteful.
Click to expand...
A thumbsup is better than waving at nobody in the distance like he does.
 






Triggaaar

Triggaaar

Well-known member
Oct 24, 2005
52,725
Goldstone


You must log in or register to reply here.
Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports

Share this page


Top
Link Here