Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

Search results

  1. W

    save are gap LANCING web site is not happy with BHA this week.

    Yep, I agree with both of you. Just thought I'd make the point that the development does need a proper assessment and the views of people on that site shouldn't be dismissed out of hand as some on here would like!
  2. W

    save are gap LANCING web site is not happy with BHA this week.

    Ages ago, obviously. I was just making a point. A more local example might be the merger of Clayton and Keymer into Hassocks. Or more recently the big expansion of Crawley with the Maidenbower site joining up older villages.
  3. W

    save are gap LANCING web site is not happy with BHA this week.

    Am I the only one who thinks the discussion on that site is quite reasonable?! There's a patch of land that people currently use for dog walking etc and they're concerned about it being turned into a private site rather than public access with community football pitches etc. They're also worried...

Top
Link Here