Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

[Albion] Chelsea: "A supercharged Brighton"



Bozza

You can change this
Helpful Moderator
Jul 4, 2003
58,707
Back in Sussex
With an average age of 23 years and five months, the Blues already have the youngest squad in the Premier League - and it is set to get even younger from next season.

The club has had a radical shift in transfer strategy since Todd Boehly and Clearlake Capital took over from Roman Abramovich in 2022.

Most Abramovich-era players have been sold in an attempt to reduce the age of the squad - and the wage bill.

That money has then been reinvested in young talent in what appears to be a 'supercharged Brighton' approach to transfer business.


 




Simster

"the man's an arse"
Jul 7, 2003
55,795
Surrey
Supercharged Brighton? Well we're highly profitable and challenging on all fronts. So that means their profits will be around the £1bn mark at the end of this tax year and they'll have a glut of trophies to show for it then. Lucky sods.

Oh wait, all they do is buy OUR players at very high prices, go out of cup competitions earlier than us, and finish about 2 places higher at best.

Supercharged Brighton? What a load of click bait wank.
 














A1X

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Sep 1, 2017
22,521
Deepest, darkest Sussex
In the same way Oasis were a “supercharged Beatles”?
 








Papa Lazarou

Living in a De Zerbi wonderland
Jul 7, 2003
19,690
Worthing
It was no secret that Todd was envious of our model when he first arrived at in the UK, and he even met with Tony at the time.

I'd guess that ideally Todd would have wanted to buy Brighton instead of Chelsea.

Instead he did the next best thing, purchased another Premier League team and attempted to recreate the model there., including taking a slew of staff to make it happen.

So, it's hardly a surprise when their model mirrors ours, just less effective at the moment
 






CHAPPERS

DISCO SPENG
Jul 5, 2003
45,273
That future proofing table is stupid. United's team is only future proofed if your ambitions are mid table mediocrity providing Bruno Fernandes stays fit.
 


Hugo Rune

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Feb 23, 2012
24,736
Brighton
It was no secret that Todd was envious of our model when he first arrived at in the UK, and he even met with Tony at the time.

I'd guess that ideally Todd would have wanted to buy Brighton instead of Chelsea.

Instead he did the next best thing, purchased another Premier League team and attempted to recreate the model there., including taking a slew of staff to make it happen.

So, it's hardly a surprise when their model mirrors ours, just less effective at the moment
I’m not sure copying our model will work for them.

The pressure and high salaries at Chelsea together with their toxic and entitled fanbase don’t work well with our way of doing things.
 










Jim in the West

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Sep 13, 2003
5,102
Way out West
Per the BBC article: "The accounting model makes some sense as the long contracts and amortisation - spreading the cost of a transfer over an extended period - have enabled Chelsea to get players like Caicedo on comparatively 'lower' £180,000-a-week wages, despite him costing a British transfer record £115m when joining in 2023 from Brighton." Well, yes, that was true when they bought Caicedo, but the Premier League (and UEFA) quickly closed that "loophole", and for FFP/PSR purposes, 5 years is the max period that a player's contract can be amortised over.

Whilst I loathe Chelsea and everything they stand for, in one sense their model is not too dissimilar to ours - in other words, putting a huge amount of effort in to identifying and developing young talent. However, Chelsea are doing so on such a scale that they simply treat players like commodities to be traded, whereas everything I read and hear about BHAFC is that we are genuinely focussed on what's best for the player, as well as the club.
 




Zeberdi

“Vorsprung durch Technik”
NSC Patron
Oct 20, 2022
8,278
I’m not sure copying our model will work for them.

The only way Chelsea will succeed to emulate our business model longterm is if they have access to TB’s scouting data analytics when it comes to sourcing young ‘undiscovered’ talent from around the world that they can buy cheap and sell high. Which they don’t as they discovered when buying Jewell, Stewart and Winstanley. Their fan club as you say, won’t have the patience to wait 2 or 3 seasons for youngsters to develop either.

They may do well financially buying younger players and reducing wage overheads but it’s not ‘supercharged’ Brighton without TB at the helm or indeed having mature players in the mix to provide experience on the pitch. We don’t just develop youngsters at Brighton but improve older players too!
 
Last edited:


Lady Whistledown

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 7, 2003
48,392
What an absolute load of arse. Chelsea's success has been dependent on the form of Cole Palmer. Unless his form picks up in the next 2 months they're going to finish outside of the Champions League places again.

Sadly I suspect they will scrape their way to fifth or above as they must still have enough games left against the rubbish teams, but <Kevin Keegan voice> I would love it, LOVE it if they failed to make the Champions League and it affected their sponsorship targets.

Hopefully their players will all be fuming at having to go and play in the utterly pointless FIFA World Cash Grab Club Cup when they should be on the beach, mentally and physically switching off from a long season, and it will lead to a load more fatigue-based injuries for them, not just in the summer but throughout the whole of next season.
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here