topbanana36
Well-known member
Certainly not a Tory. Never voted a mainstream party in my political life.
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
[Politics] Sir Keir Starmer’s route to Number 10
- Thread starter Rdodge30
- Start date
aolstudios
Well-known member
That absolutely is what she said
Is it PotG?
Thrifty non-licker
1/20 now.....kerrching.
PascalGroß Tips
Well-known member
- Jan 29, 2024
- 324
... deleted as I've just seen the Russell-Moyle story has already been posted on the Labour meltdown thread 
Is it PotG?
Thrifty non-licker
Sounding really forceful today, basically it's MY party and I'll use nukes if I want.
Pottymouth not quite so vehement.
Pottymouth not quite so vehement.
Is it PotG?
Thrifty non-licker
Starmer last spoke to Abbott 'two or three months ago'
Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer is in Greater Manchester, where he has been discussing the row around Diane Abbott.He is asked about a social media post which claims he was lying about "having respect for her" as a Labour candidate in Hackney North and Stoke Newington.
Has he spoken to Ms Abbott since then?
"We have dealt with the Diane Abbott issue," Sir Keir says.
"The choice is continue with the chaos of division or turn the page with Labour."
The Labour leader says Ms Abbott "will be part of that".
Asked again, he says: "I spoke to Diane two or three months ago."
No issues there then.
Good to see strong leadership.
Is it PotG?
Thrifty non-licker
My thoughts exactly.
Not talking to Abbott for months, singing 'It's My Party and I'll Nuke if I want To' contrary to the views of his underlings, solid base indeed.
ROSM
Well-known member
Did he really sing that? Wow..do you have a video of it?
- Oct 20, 2022
- 5,119
She’s completely missing the point and twisted what Abbott said. Neither Abbott nor Ms Singer have clearly never sat in a synagogue with rocks being thrown at the window nor sat in an office full of people characterising Jewish people as having lots of money and having long noses as I have. This woman nor Dianne Abbott have clearly never suffered antisemitism herself nor been exposed to it but that does not mean it doesn’t exist..
Of course Jews suffer racial abuse all their lives. It is just a different type of abuse and often more subtle but just as devastating - not focussed on skin colour or sus laws but about race, culture and religion and a lot of it takes place online on social media. Literature is full of Jewish characters built on stereotypical tropes including relating to what Jews “look like” and is still taught in schools.
Racial discrimination doesn’t have to be directed at any one individual to exist. The whole group can be targeted. It IS antisemitic to delete centuries of racial persecution of the Jewish people, including the Holocaust and say compared to Black people, Jewish people don’t suffer racism like Black people - if the gassing or shooting of 6 million Jews doesn’t count as racial abuse then wtf was it? And Jewish people don’t stop being Jewish after being exposed to antisemitic behaviour, they are Jewish all their lives., Jewish tropes are ingrained in Western consciousness.
The only reason Starmer allowed Dianne Abbott to be reinstated and rubber stamped into a safe Constituency was to keep the Left of his Party quiet to avoid disruptions and a backbench rebellion going into the election and . If Abbott had been a moderate/centrist things may have been very different - I doubt she even would have had the whip restored.
From Left to Right: An Overview of the ‘Veiled’ Antisemitism Threat Landscape Online
This Dispatch provides an overview of the online antisemitism threat landscape, which has increased in recent years, particularly since the pandemic.
www.isdglobal.org
Last edited:
aolstudios
Well-known member
This ^She’s completely missing the point and twisted what Abbott said. Neither Abbott nor Ms Singer have clearly never sat in a synagogue with rocks being thrown at the window nor sat in an office full of people characterising Jewish people as having lots of money and having long noses as I have. This woman nor Dianne Abbott have clearly never suffered antisemitism herself nor been exposed to it but that does not mean it doesn’t exist..
Of course Jews suffer racial abuse all their lives. It is just a different type of abuse and often more subtle but just as devastating - not focussed on skin colour or sus laws but about race, culture and religion and a lot of it takes place online on social media. Literature is full of Jewish characters built on stereotypical tropes including relating to what Jews “look like” and is still taught in schools.
Racial discrimination doesn’t have to be directed at any one individual to exist. The whole group can be targeted. It IS antisemitic to delete centuries of racial persecution of the Jewish people, including the Holocaust and say compared to Black people, Jewish people don’t suffer racism like Black people - if the gassing or shooting of 6 million Jews doesn’t count as racial abuse then wtf was it? And Jewish people don’t stop being Jewish after being exposed to antisemitic behaviour, they are Jewish all their lives., Jewish tropes are ingrained in Western consciousness.
The only reason Starmer allowed Dianne Abbott to be reinstated and rubber stamped into a safe Constituency was to keep the Left of his Party quiet to avoid disruptions and a backbench rebellion going into the election and . If Abbott had been a moderate/centrist things may have been very different - I doubt she even would have had the whip restored
From Left to Right: An Overview of the ‘Veiled’ Antisemitism Threat Landscape Online
This Dispatch provides an overview of the online antisemitism threat landscape, which has increased in recent years, particularly since the pandemic.www.isdglobal.org
All of it
medwayseagull reborn
Well-known member
- Oct 12, 2022
- 383
How is the monster raving loony party these days?
topbanana36
Well-known member
would do a better than job than Jimmy Savilles mate and the fake Conservatives we’ve had for 14 years.
Is it PotG?
Thrifty non-licker
Labour drops legal action against Corbyn-era staff
The Labour Party has abandoned longstanding legal action against five former members of staff who have been accused of "conspiring" against Sir Keir Starmer’s leadership.
The action is estimated to have cost the party millions of pounds, which critics said could otherwise have been spent on the general election campaign.
The five included two key figures from the Jeremy Corbyn era – ex- director of communications Seumas Milne and Mr Corbyn’s former chief of staff Karie Murphy.
They were accused of leaking a controversial report soon after Sir Keir became the Labour leader in 2020.
Good news all round
The Labour Party has abandoned longstanding legal action against five former members of staff who have been accused of "conspiring" against Sir Keir Starmer’s leadership.
The action is estimated to have cost the party millions of pounds, which critics said could otherwise have been spent on the general election campaign.
The five included two key figures from the Jeremy Corbyn era – ex- director of communications Seumas Milne and Mr Corbyn’s former chief of staff Karie Murphy.
They were accused of leaking a controversial report soon after Sir Keir became the Labour leader in 2020.
'Eye-watering sums'
A former shadow cabinet member – who did not wish to identified – told the BBC the party should have dropped the legal action earlier.Good news all round