Yes - but the point is if Sky want to show more games and have the revenue, they'll need to pay the clubs more money - they can't decide to show extra games and simply keep the 14.95 or whatever. It's the club's product, not theirs (hence the PPV revenue going mostly to the clubs, not the...
It's not a 'contractual obligation' though is it - it's something Sky have paid for and the basis of the PL's massive revenue. Sky have no rights to broadcast any more games unless the PL let them (ie sell that right to them) - hence most of the PPV revenue going to the clubs, not...
Who is dismissing what ? The majority of the revenue is going to the clubs (shared equally, not game by game), not Sky/BT/Amazon. Anything the broadcasters get is a drop in the ocean compared to their subscription revenue.
Have you just received 45 similar emails, whilst digesting a report that potentially screws the club over forever that you have to deal with and with Tony and the Argus trying to get you on the phone to find out WTF is going on.....on your day off ?
Absolutely - most of us have done it at some point though (and far more likely to happen if stressed). Write the reply, don't press send, read it an hour later or the following day......................he seems to like the rapid response though, which possibly contributed........
He explained earlier (and is doing so again now) - was a simple take it or leave it and the revenue plugs a small part of a huge hole ('Hobson's choice'). At least we get to see some football if we want.
Cumulative annoyance...........a large of what he says and does is reasonable, so maybe give him a bit of rope for a snippy reply to email no 45 he'd received that day ?
Would love to be a fly on the wall at the EPL meetings - can imagine him kicking right off based on the thinly-veiled anger...