Search results

I don't know how true it is, but I recall there being a report that Boehly's approach, was to offer longer contracts, with lower wages as a trade-off.

I assume they would have to cash in all the amortisation of Caicedo's fee , so selling cheap is of no value to them.

The trouble with this is, that once the litigation route is open to "impacted" clubs, the whole thing becomes unworkable. The petro-state clubs, will employ even more lawyers, to bind the process even tighter and the governing bodies will shy away from enforcing their own rules.

I don't really see where the grounds for the lawsuits are. The issue is that Everton spunked a load of money on players that managed to get them 39 and 36 pts in a season. It's hardly if the extra spend got them an unfair advantage is it? Surely the complaint the relegated teams have is with...

Absolutely this. 0 pts for a deliberate and confessed breach of FFP by £19m - sets a meaningful marker. Everton fans claiming that a 10 pt deduction is harsh are absolutely missing the point. 10 pts in either of the past 2 seasons would have seen them comfortably relegated. This season, they...

Chelsea and City have been most responsible for the inflation in Fees and wages. City in particular have moved away from transfer fees and into escalating wages, to price out the opposition. If the Premier league fail to bring Chelsea and City to account, with meaningful sanctions...

Both?