Rusthall Seagull
New member
Have you spoken to someone about that ?
no, I used an app to help me
Have you spoken to someone about that ?
Can someone please explain this Apple Wars stuff? I will soon need a new phone, I've looked at the iphone and think it is easy for an idiot like me to use and suits what I want it for. If it has a shit camera? Great, I never use them anyway. I have never owned an Apple product in my life yet if I decide to buy an iphone on merit then a large number of people automatically see me a a trend following twat. Why? I don't really care, I'd just like to understand their reasoning.
no, I used an app to help me
Yes, I'd imagine there is one.
It's a little thing about thinking that giving money to a large American corporation for something not worth the price tag makes you individual, special and wierdly anti-corporate.
Yeah you TWAT. I bet it worked TWATTILY well, as well.
I can believe that there are people who buy it for the brand or some perceived level of kudos. But this is one of the best selling electrical products on the planet, surely not every owner is like that, can't some people just need a new phone? Or is that ridiculous?
I am a total mobile phone geek, I am on my 6th Phone in the last 12 months. I have owned at leas tone of all the current smartphone varieties on the market at one point or another and until the 3Gs was release I had resisted the iphones lure because it was poor in a few essential features, all the while I had an ipod touch.
My observations of the iphone are, its a great piece of kit and whilst ther eare a few shotcomings they are not major.
1. Camera is average but then I have had phones with supposed better cameras which are no good either, In fact the best photos I have taken with a camera was with my old k800i sony ericsson and that was only 3.2 megapixels.
2. No flash support on the web browser - A bit of a pian but realistically the only flash site I use is you tube and there is a built in you tube app anyway so whilst a sligth annoyance no big deal.
3. No multi-tasking - Not an issue because apps open and close so chuffing fast that it makes no difference. You can multi tak the ipod, sms and email apps in that they remain open where you left them and you can listen to music whilst using other apps so thats fine by me.
There isn't any other real problems with the device it is very fast, very easy to use and ther eis an app available many for free that does just about anything you want of a device like this. The email works perfetly and is just as usable as a blackberry, The safari web browser is MILES better than any other and yes whil Nokia use the same technology behind their browser, even on the N97 the web surfing experience is shite with the build in browser.
Put it this way its the first phone I have owned in probably three or four years that I am still very happy with after more than three months of ownership which for me says a lot.
Well yeah.....there is all that but....but....but...you're still a TWAT. Just cos.
![]()
This is the company who backed the wrong horse for processors in 1993
Near flawless track record? Apple?
This is the company who backed the wrong horse for processors in 1993 and spent until 2005 pumping millions in to ever more desperate advertising campaigns claiming their slow, energy wasting, heat belching processors were better than standard Intel units, before eventually skulking over to Intels side. Their tune switched from "G5s are 2x faster than Intel units" to "Xeons are 4x faster than G5s" in the space of a month.
This is the company that spent ten years claiming their operating system was better than Windows, then bought one in and told everyone their old one was actually shit, sorry 'bout that, please buy new hardware to use this one...
This is the company that spunked millions developing a television STB only for sales to be woeful.
Twice. (once in the 1990s and now with the AppleTV).
This is the company that has had more problems with faulty mobile device batteries than any other, from laptops to phones and media players.
Camera is "pretty good" but is still mid range for a phone. It has a high-end phone price point, it should have a high end phones camera (5+MP, optical zoom, reputable lens brand, etc)
Single tasking means you can't have two non-background applications open at once. Apple have historically been very, very bad at multitasking - MacOS didn't support it at all originally then had a bad implementation of it that could crash the entire system until 1999.
It IS featureless for its price point - compare the feature list of an iPhone to a similarly priced Nokia, Samsung, Palm or Blackberry and you'll see the Apple is a mid ranged device.
Its web browser is Webkit Mobile which is also on every Nokia for about four years - before the iPhone even existed it was on the high end Nokia units.
Its mp3 player is an iPod which I'd well challenge as being "best" - its only the best if you've been sucked in to iPod brand worship before getting the phone.
Can someone please explain this Apple Wars stuff? I will soon need a new phone, I've looked at the iphone and think it is easy for an idiot like me to use and suits what I want it for. If it has a shit camera? Great, I never use them anyway. I have never owned an Apple product in my life yet if I decide to buy an iphone on merit then a large number of people automatically see me a a trend following twat. Why? I don't really care, I'd just like to understand their reasoning.