Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

[Politics] Labour Party meltdown incoming.......



beorhthelm

A. Virgo, Football Genius
Jul 21, 2003
36,062
Isn't there?, a coincidence I'm sure that this figure is the same as the supposed £22bn black hole

it is a conincidence. that funding is over 25 years and was mostly already planned. makes use of the old oil and gas fields, creates a new industry, actual does something useful towards delivering net zero carbon.
 




nicko31

Well-known member
Jan 7, 2010
18,706
Gods country fortnightly
it is a conincidence. that funding is over 25 years and was mostly already planned. makes use of the old oil and gas fields, creates a new industry, actual does something useful towards delivering net zero carbon.
By my calc, assuming it works it will cover about 10% of our emissions from domestic heating. This Tory idea seems more about politics than practicality
 


Curious Orange

Punxsatawney Phil
Jul 5, 2003
10,257
On NSC for over two decades...
I guess this is over 25 years, still a lot of money. Must admit I'm not a fan of carbon capture, sends the wrong message

Are we we talking about capturing carbon dioxide? Not all of it needs to be stored, it has many uses in industry.
 


pb21

Well-known member
Apr 23, 2010
6,715
I guess this is over 25 years, still a lot of money. Must admit I'm not a fan of carbon capture, sends the wrong message

We'd be better off spending money in reducing consumption is fossil fuels, like insulating the most leaky homes in northern Europe.
Can be used on ERFs too, not just gas fired generators.
 


dsr-burnley

Well-known member
Aug 15, 2014
2,678
I think the private schools themselves can claim some credit due to the 9% price rises they've previously done( and seem to do most years).

Still they'll be filling up unsubscribed schools and allowing them to function more efficiently.

Sorry, what was the bad news?
If there are schools with fewer pupils and smaller class sizes and still people don't want to go to them, then it suggests that making children go to them is bad news. "This school is appalling, let's expand it" is not my recipe for success.
 




keaton

Big heart, hot blood and balls. Big balls
Nov 18, 2004
9,982
If there are schools with fewer pupils and smaller class sizes and still people don't want to go to them, then it suggests that making children go to them is bad news. "This school is appalling, let's expand it" is not my recipe for success.
You are assuming there's a correlation between "bad" schools and popularity and or oversubscription. In my experience there isn't. But the best way to improve those schools ( and therefore support the children attending them) is for them to be as near to full as possible
 


nicko31

Well-known member
Jan 7, 2010
18,706
Gods country fortnightly
Are we we talking about capturing carbon dioxide? Not all of it needs to be stored, it has many uses in industry.
There are but most of them involve Co2 re-entering the atmosphere. There's usually a large release if we beat Palace at the Amex...
 
















Weststander

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Aug 25, 2011
69,825
Withdean area
What scenario, big old house retro fit or new build?

The average. Not an anecdote.

But I’ve just found this. Current average cost to government/homeowner is £12,800 per dwelling.

 
Last edited:


pb21

Well-known member
Apr 23, 2010
6,715
The average. Not an anecdote.

But I’ve just found this. Current average cost to government/homeowner is £12,600 per dwelling.

That applies to retrofit.

The £26k average also sounds suspect, was it the average cost for a 5 bedroom 200 year house?
 








beorhthelm

A. Virgo, Football Genius
Jul 21, 2003
36,062

funny how some people go to so much length to discredit a technology that may be the only feasible way to achieve net zero. it's as if they dont want that to work and have another agenda.
 






Machiavelli

Well-known member
Oct 11, 2013
17,916
Fiveways
Is it very possible it doesn't work and is just another way for companies to reap huge profits at the taxpayers expense?


Well, I'm with @beorhthelm on this one. Its current performance is dire granted, but each component part of the technology has been proven to work, so there's no reason why it can't. It could lead to negative emissions too, which is worth reflecting on.
You invoke Monbiot, who has a very good track record on the green transition but has been very vocal in defending nuclear. Do you think he's right on this and, if so, is this just another way for companies to reap huge profits at the taxpayers expense (and, I'd add, produce very expensive energy at the billpayers expense)?
 


Kinky Gerbil

Im The Scatman
NSC Patron
Jul 16, 2003
58,806
hassocks
Well, I'm with @beorhthelm on this one. Its current performance is dire granted, but each component part of the technology has been proven to work, so there's no reason why it can't. It could lead to negative emissions too, which is worth reflecting on.
You invoke Monbiot, who has a very good track record on the green transition but has been very vocal in defending nuclear. Do you think he's right on this and, if so, is this just another way for companies to reap huge profits at the taxpayers expense (and, I'd add, produce very expensive energy at the billpayers expense)?
OMG we agree 😂
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here