Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

[Albion] VAR decision on Estupiñán goal



pure_white

Well-known member
Dec 8, 2021
1,216
Just get rid of VAR. If we miss out on Europe by 2 points there will be trouble. We should we awarded the match and 3 points and deduct a point from Pal@rse.
 


















Dirty Dave

Well-known member
Aug 28, 2006
3,012
Worthing
It kind of feels the National media are making more of Ivan Toney's goal wrongly standing after the VAR check than our goal being chalked off
 




nickjhs

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Apr 9, 2017
1,374
Ballarat, Australia
My guess is that is angle VAR used to disallow the goal. The justification is likely to be because they didn't have full view of the defender behind, (the one playing Estupinan on) they used the the one in front.

Terrible decision
In this situation the goal should always stand. How can they make decisions with such minute margins for error without all the information. FFS do we now need a VVAR, perhaps the on pitch Ref should always review the footage before making the final decision. Or better still use VAR for clear and obvious errors and stop this nonsense, but they cant even do that, prime example West Ham/Chelsea WTF, that was nearly as bad a Maradona.
 


Seagull58

In the Algarve
Jan 31, 2012
7,633
Vilamoura, Portugal
Rubbish. Corrupt? Nah. Just incompetence.
I cannot see how the 2 decisions yesterday against Brighton and Arsenal can be down to incompetence. Mason literally "forgot" to draw the lines and check for offside. Brooks literally "did not see" the other defender nearer the goal. It has to be deliberate, corrupt decision-making. We've had match-fixing in cricket, tennis and snooker, driven by Asian betting syndicates. It is the obvious reason for yesterday's "errors".
 


Springal

Well-known member
Feb 12, 2005
24,177
GOSBTS
I cannot see how the 2 decisions yesterday against Brighton and Arsenal can be down to incompetence. Mason literally "forgot" to draw the lines and check for offside. Brooks literally "did not see" the other defender nearer the goal. It has to be deliberate, corrupt decision-making. We've had match-fixing in cricket, tennis and snooker, driven by Asian betting syndicates. It is the obvious reason for yesterday's "errors".
How does that work? The goal was the first of the game, so what was the ‘bet’ ? Or maybe Sanchez took a bung as well ?
 








Gazwag

5 millionth post poster
Mar 4, 2004
30,285
Bexhill-on-Sea
Bournemouth got relegated thanks to a technology "error" nobody important cared, just like nobody will if little ole brighton miss out on Europe because of var "error"
 




Zeberdi

“Vorsprung durch Technik”
NSC Patron
Oct 20, 2022
5,383
-
 
Last edited:




jcdenton08

Offended Liver Sausage
NSC Patron
Oct 17, 2008
11,570
One of those things.

hopefully heads will finally roll (figuratively speaking, not literally, that would be awful) and PGMOL finally start making real changes to improve the standard. A standard of refereeing which is frankly inept
 


Zeberdi

“Vorsprung durch Technik”
NSC Patron
Oct 20, 2022
5,383
The tweet only seems to show half a story - and not accessible to non twitter folk

Whole one here - if the DM is your poison
 






Diallo

Well-known member
Jan 3, 2021
357

How can they improve human error through a meeting though? Human error has always been an issue with officiating since football began. Unless the technology gets improved where it actually makes the decisions, then surely these human errors will just continue?
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here