jonny.rainbow
Well-known member
- Oct 29, 2005
- 6,982
Somebody who swallows up the negative press covfefe.What in the everloving f*** is a 'panican' ?
Somebody who swallows up the negative press covfefe.What in the everloving f*** is a 'panican' ?
But he doesn't want that, he wants every country to beg, grovel & then he will tell them to f*** off.From CNN:
The European Union is “ready to negotiate” with the United States and has offered to scrap tariffs on industrial goods, Ursula Von der Leyen, president of the European Commission, said Monday.
"We have offered zero-for-zero tariffs for industrial goods, as we have successfully done with many other trading partners, because Europe is always ready for a good deal,” she said.
Asked when the EU tabled the zero-tariff offer, von der Leyen said the offer was made “long before” Trump’s latest tariff announcement and “repeatedly, for example, in the automotive sector.” She stressed that the EU has long gone “zero for zero with other countries that also have a strong automotive sector.”
Sorry I really don't think certain members of the EU will see that. We left therefore we must be punished even if we rejoin. Conditions imposed would be horrendous.Think security. Not trade. The EU needs us more than ever with Putin looking at what EU states he can bring under his control. They are fully aware how powerful they would become with us back on board.
He also wants deregulation of social media so that all protections can be removed, regulation on food safety binned as well as tax cuts for Amazon and the like.But he doesn't want that, he wants every country to beg, grovel & then he will tell them to f*** off.
It is not for the likes of you and I to understand. We’re just not on Trump’s intellectual plane.What in the everloving f*** is a 'panican' ?
They really won't. We won't have the same concessions as before but there won't be any imposed conditions.Sorry I really don't think certain members of the EU will see that. We left therefore we must be punished even if we rejoin. Conditions imposed would be horrendous.
It is not for the likes of you and I to understand. We’re just not on Trump’s intellectual plane.
Sorry I really don't think certain members of the EU will see that. We left therefore we must be punished even if we rejoin. Conditions imposed would be horrendous.
I read the Project 2025 chapter on trade, written by Navarro, last week*. It clearly advocates a position that increasing US tariffs to match foreign tariffs would decrease trade deficits more than if those countries reduced tariffs to the US rate.From CNN:
The European Union is “ready to negotiate” with the United States and has offered to scrap tariffs on industrial goods, Ursula Von der Leyen, president of the European Commission, said Monday.
"We have offered zero-for-zero tariffs for industrial goods, as we have successfully done with many other trading partners, because Europe is always ready for a good deal,” she said.
Asked when the EU tabled the zero-tariff offer, von der Leyen said the offer was made “long before” Trump’s latest tariff announcement and “repeatedly, for example, in the automotive sector.” She stressed that the EU has long gone “zero for zero with other countries that also have a strong automotive sector.”
That's what I, as a remainer, used to think. There will be some member states who may now feel like this,Sorry I really don't think certain members of the EU will see that. We left therefore we must be punished even if we rejoin. Conditions imposed would be horrendous.
I love random capitalization.
Also, Trump has said that countries will have to “pay a lot of money every year” to get the tariffs removed. Given what we’ve seen of his idea of a fair deal in Ukraine, a crazy thought that entered my head is that he might demand “repayment” of all annual US trade deficit by those countries. It’s an insane idea, but Trump is insane and it would fit with his idiotic rhetoric about the US being screwed over.I read the Project 2025 chapter on trade, written by Navarro, last week*. It clearly advocates a position that increasing US tariffs to match foreign tariffs would decrease trade deficits more than if those countries reduced tariffs to the US rate.
It also says the US should pursue trade deals with “mutual recognition” of standards. Meaning, if US regulators decide it’s fine for their agriculture to be marinaded in strychnine, regulators in other countries are meant to be fine with that.
* It was still more enjoyable than the Palace game
Trump can’t be trusted so simplest solution is to mirror exactly what he does in terms of tariffs. It’ll drive him nuts and weakens his position.Also, Trump has said that countries will have to “pay a lot of money every year” to get the tariffs removed. Given what we’ve seen of his idea of a fair deal in Ukraine, a crazy thought that entered my head is that he might demand “repayment” of all annual US trade deficit by those countries. It’s an insane idea, but Trump is insane and it would fit with his idiotic rhetoric about the US being screwed over.
I'm sure the US can find mutual recognition of food hygiene standards with....errr, Russia for example.I read the Project 2025 chapter on trade, written by Navarro, last week*. It clearly advocates a position that increasing US tariffs to match foreign tariffs would decrease trade deficits more than if those countries reduced tariffs to the US rate.
It also says the US should pursue trade deals with “mutual recognition” of standards. Meaning, if US regulators decide it’s fine for their agriculture to be marinaded in strychnine, regulators in other countries are meant to be fine with that.
* It was still more enjoyable than the Palace game
How far back could he go, 1949 maybe? "That's really beautiful repayment..."Also, Trump has said that countries will have to “pay a lot of money every year” to get the tariffs removed. Given what we’ve seen of his idea of a fair deal in Ukraine, a crazy thought that entered my head is that he might demand “repayment” of all annual US trade deficit by those countries. It’s an insane idea, but Trump is insane and it would fit with his idiotic rhetoric about the US being screwed over.
It’s lose-lose either way. Personally, I like the “f*** you too” option but that’s easy for me to say.Trump can’t be trusted so simplest solution is to mirror exactly what he does in terms of tariffs. It’ll drive him nuts and weakens his position.
It will be lose-lose regardless of what we do. If we give in then he’ll f**k us over again and again, so imho we effectively tell him to go forth by mirroring his every move. He needs something to react against so mirroring takes that option away.It’s lose-lose either way. Personally, I like the “f*** you too” option but that’s easy for me to say.