Tom Hark Preston Park
Will Post For Cash
- Jul 6, 2003
- 73,967
All parties wanted the loan deal to succeed. Purely down to Evan to force his way into the reckoning at West Ham
Potts doing well there he’s made the bottom 4All parties wanted the loan deal to succeed. Purely down to Evan to force his way into the reckoning at West Ham
Just another full season and a bit for Plodder to get up to speed thenPotts doing well there he’s made the bottom 4![]()
But it was never going to.All parties wanted the loan deal to succeed. Purely down to Evan to force his way into the reckoning at West Ham
No, that’s not allowed mid-season. Would only be allowed during the January transfer window, and like Barco, we wouldn’t necessarily be forced to take him back.surprised hammers havent returned him (assuming thats allowed mid-season?). if hes not getting game time then why they would continue to pay his wages is beyond me.
It's a fair call. And I think the same applies to Buonanotte.Why are we criticising West Ham for not playing a player who’s done jack all every time he’s been given a chance? The only person to blame for Evan not getting game time is Evan.
It isn't.surprised hammers havent returned him (assuming thats allowed mid-season?). if hes not getting game time then why they would continue to pay his wages is beyond me.
No it doesn't. Buonanotte was doing fine at Leicester - one of their best players, in fact, according to their fans. Then horse-face took over, didn't like him, dropped him - and Leicester have got worse and worse since (except on bloody Saturday, of courseIt's a fair call. And I think the same applies to Buonanotte.
In RVN's case it was more 'shoot yourself in the foot' rather than 'shoot your own granny!'The manager is never singling a player out. Down the bottom of the table they will shoot their own grannies for a point. It's up to the player to force their way in and take the chance
Started away to Wolves two games ago, but hooked at half time.Nowhere near the 1st team, useless loan
They looked decent against Liverpool. Should have got something from the game.So west ham are a team that's struggling. Dropping in the league and looking dull and inspiring for large chunks of a game.
Wonder who their next away game is against.....
I don't like it and maybe Leicester fans don't like it. But it's a legitimate selection decision. Facu just hasn't done enough, either during training or in his appearances to convince the manager that he's the player who will get them points.No it doesn't. Buonanotte was doing fine at Leicester - one of their best players, in fact, according to their fans. Then horse-face took over, didn't like him, dropped him - and Leicester have got worse and worse since (except on bloody Saturday, of course)
In RVN's case it was more 'shoot yourself in the foot' rather than 'shoot your own granny!'
He was literally their best player (according to Leicester fans and the evidence of our eyes) when RVN came in. He was getting them points with his performances.I don't like it and maybe Leicester fans don't like it. But it's a legitimate selection decision. Facu just hasn't done enough, either during training or in his appearances to convince the manager that he's the player who will get them points.
So Leicester have picked up and improved without Buonanotte in the team, have they? Weird analysis, that.I don't like it and maybe Leicester fans don't like it. But it's a legitimate selection decision. Facu just hasn't done enough, either during training or in his appearances to convince the manager that he's the player who will get them points.
It's highly unlikely the manager has a personal dislike of the player which he's putting above the chance to get points.
Different managers just want different types of players and when they made the change, it went from a decent loan to a bad one. This is far from uncommon