- Nov 15, 2006
- 6,371
Me too but it all fell apart when City insisted it had to be a transfer and not a loanI'm pretty sure we tried to get him (on loan?)
Me too but it all fell apart when City insisted it had to be a transfer and not a loanI'm pretty sure we tried to get him (on loan?)
Looks like we goofed up then - what did they want for him?Me too but it all fell apart when City insisted it had to be a transfer and not a loan
£40m if he scored 20 goals £80m +They might be now but they weren't established in the PL when we bought them. Unlike Delap, who has now scored double numbers and established himself.
He does not fit our model. Our model is not to sign established Premier League players who are going to want very high wages. There will be no Liam Delap or Tyler Dibling in Brighton.
No idea but when Chelsea came knocking it was all over I guess. Chelsea were never going to want him on loanLooks like we goofed up then - what did they want for him?
Presumably, what Chelsea paid for him C£40m. However unlike a loan, a transfer to us would have meant us having to negotiate a salary. He's reportedly on £125k a year at Chelsea, so wouldn't have been coming here.Looks like we goofed up then - what did they want for him?
If that's all he wanted we'd have bitten his hand off!Presumably, what Chelsea paid for him C£40m. However unlike a loan, a transfer to us would have meant us having to negotiate a salary. He's reportedly on £125k a year at Chelsea, so wouldn't have been coming here.
If that's all he wanted we'd have bitten his hand off!
You know I’m not being serious right?Doubt that, why is Ensisco not playing with his mate at Brighton ?